What every reader should know about studies using electronic health record data but may be afraid to ask

Isaac S. Kohane, Bruce J. Aronow, Paul Avillach, Brett K. Beaulieu-Jones, Riccardo Bellazzi, Robert L. Bradford, Gabriel A. Brat, Mario Cannataro, James J. Cimino, Noelia García-Barrio, Nils Gehlenborg, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Alba Gutiérrez-Sacristán, David A. Hanauer, John H. Holmes, Chuan Hong, Jeffrey G. Klann, Ne Hooi Will Loh, Yuan Luo, Kenneth D. MandlMohamad Daniar, Jason H. Moore, Shawn N. Murphy, Antoine Neuraz, Kee Yuan Ngiam, Gilbert S. Omenn, Nathan Palmer, Lav P. Patel, Miguel Pedrera-Jiménez, Piotr Sliz, Andrew M. South, Amelia Li Min Tan, Deanne M. Taylor, Bradley W. Taylor, Carlo Torti, Andrew K. Vallejos, Kavishwar B. Wagholikar, Griffin M. Weber, Tianxi Cai

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftArtikelpeer review

Samenvatting

Coincident with the tsunami of COVID-19-related publications, there has been a surge of studies using real-world data, including those obtained from the electronic health record (EHR). Unfortunately, several of these high-profile publications were retracted because of concerns regarding the soundness and quality of the studies and the EHR data they purported to analyze. These retractions highlight that although a small community of EHR informatics experts can readily identify strengths and flaws in EHR-derived studies, many medical editorial teams and otherwise sophisticated medical readers lack the framework to fully critically appraise these studies. In addition, conventional statistical analyses cannot overcome the need for an understanding of the opportunities and limitations of EHR-derived studies. We distill here from the broader informatics literature six key considerations that are crucial for appraising studies utilizing EHR data: Data completeness, data collection and handling (eg, transformation), data type (ie, codified, textual), robustness of methods against EHR variability (within and across institutions, countries, and time), transparency of data and analytic code, and the multidisciplinary approach. These considerations will inform researchers, clinicians, and other stakeholders as to the recommended best practices in reviewing manuscripts, grants, and other outputs from EHR-data derived studies, and thereby promote and foster rigor, quality, and reliability of this rapidly growing field.
Originele taal-2Engels
TijdschriftJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume23
Nummer van het tijdschrift3
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 1 mrt 2021

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'What every reader should know about studies using electronic health record data but may be afraid to ask'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit