TY - JOUR
T1 - 80 questions for UK biological security
AU - Kemp, Luke
AU - Aldridge, David C.
AU - Booy, Olaf
AU - Bower, Hilary
AU - Browne, Des
AU - Burgmann, Mark
AU - Burt, Austin
AU - Cunningham, Andrew A.
AU - Dando, Malcolm
AU - Dick, Jaimie T.A.
AU - Dye, Christopher
AU - Evans, Sam Weiss
AU - Gallardo, Belinda
AU - Godfray, Charles H.J.
AU - Goodfellow, Ian
AU - Gubbins, Simon
AU - Holt, Lauren A.
AU - Jones, Kate E.
AU - Kandil, Hazem
AU - Martin, Phillip
AU - McCaughan, Mark
AU - McLeish, Caitríona
AU - Meany, Thomas
AU - Millett, Kathryn
AU - Óhéigeartaigh, Sean S.
AU - Patron, Nicola J.
AU - Rhodes, Catherine
AU - Roy, Helen E.
AU - Shackelford, Gorm
AU - Smith, Derek
AU - Spence, Nicola
AU - Steiner, Helene
AU - Sundaram, Lalitha S.
AU - Voeneky, Silja
AU - Walker, John R.
AU - Watkins, Harry
AU - Whitby, Simon
AU - Wood, James
AU - Sutherland, William J.
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - © 2021 Kemp et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Multiple national and international trends and drivers are radically changing what biological security means for the United Kingdom (UK). New technologies present novel opportunities and challenges, and globalisation has created new pathways and increased the speed, volume and routes by which organisms can spread. The UK Biological Security Strategy (2018) acknowledges the importance of research on biological security in the UK. Given the breadth of potential research, a targeted agenda identifying the questions most critical to effective and coordinated progress in different disciplines of biological security is required. We used expert elicitation to generate 80 policy-relevant research questions considered by participants to have the greatest impact on UK biological security. Drawing on a collaboratively-developed set of 450 questions, proposed by 41 experts from academia, industry and the UK government (consulting 168 additional experts) we subdivided the final 80 questions into six categories: bioengineering; communication and behaviour; disease threats (including pandemics); governance and policy; invasive alien species; and securing biological materials and securing against misuse. Initially, the questions were ranked through a voting process and then reduced and refined to 80 during a one-day workshop with 35 participants from a variety of disciplines. Consistently emerging themes included: the nature of current and potential biological security threats, the efficacy of existing management actions, and the most appropriate future options. The resulting questions offer a research agenda for biological security in the UK that can assist the targeting of research resources and inform the implementation of the UK Biological Security Strategy. These questions include research that could aid with the mitigation of Covid-19, and preparation for the next pandemic. We hope that our structured and rigorous approach to creating a biological security research agenda will be replicated in other countries and regions. The world, not just the UK, is in need of a thoughtful approach to directing biological security research to tackle the emerging issues.
AB - © 2021 Kemp et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Multiple national and international trends and drivers are radically changing what biological security means for the United Kingdom (UK). New technologies present novel opportunities and challenges, and globalisation has created new pathways and increased the speed, volume and routes by which organisms can spread. The UK Biological Security Strategy (2018) acknowledges the importance of research on biological security in the UK. Given the breadth of potential research, a targeted agenda identifying the questions most critical to effective and coordinated progress in different disciplines of biological security is required. We used expert elicitation to generate 80 policy-relevant research questions considered by participants to have the greatest impact on UK biological security. Drawing on a collaboratively-developed set of 450 questions, proposed by 41 experts from academia, industry and the UK government (consulting 168 additional experts) we subdivided the final 80 questions into six categories: bioengineering; communication and behaviour; disease threats (including pandemics); governance and policy; invasive alien species; and securing biological materials and securing against misuse. Initially, the questions were ranked through a voting process and then reduced and refined to 80 during a one-day workshop with 35 participants from a variety of disciplines. Consistently emerging themes included: the nature of current and potential biological security threats, the efficacy of existing management actions, and the most appropriate future options. The resulting questions offer a research agenda for biological security in the UK that can assist the targeting of research resources and inform the implementation of the UK Biological Security Strategy. These questions include research that could aid with the mitigation of Covid-19, and preparation for the next pandemic. We hope that our structured and rigorous approach to creating a biological security research agenda will be replicated in other countries and regions. The world, not just the UK, is in need of a thoughtful approach to directing biological security research to tackle the emerging issues.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099440450&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0241190
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0241190
M3 - Article
VL - 16
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 1 January
ER -